The stuff you say about islam is the exact same thing the christian church has been doing for hundreds of years: regression of humanity in every possible way. i know that the institution itself has nothing to do with having a relationship with Jesus in your opinion, and i couldn’t agree more, but this shows that there might also be muslims who don’t believe in the jihad and the similar violent stuff, but only in the “peaceful parts” of their religion, just like you do. a same “kill the infidels” case can be made against christianity just as against muslims, christianity just did that a while back, not today.
i have a bit of time now, so i’ll collect a couple of issues i mentioned which you have yet to address:
can you specify even a bit of supporting evidence-like anything, that goes towards showing that the christian god himself is the true god / creator? the sole existence of Jesus is not valid, because he was a prophet just like countless others, and was in no way special. of course he was special for *you*, because you’re a christian, but try to see yourself from the perspective of someone who is outside of all religions. how would you convince, or just show the true nature of your religion, AND the fabricated nature of the others at the same time? your answer to this will basically supply the sole reason why you are a christian and not of some other faith, so make it a good one.
put a bit differently, could you convince a muslim for example that his religion is wrong without mentioning anything christian-related, so not using your own religion in your process of reasoning?
do you think that something that cannot be explained or disproved by science automatically becomes the evidence of god? if yes, and that way of thinking is how religions are supposed to be dealt with, do you think you could make a successful case against the existence of santa claus, if i were to believe in him?
why do you have any more reason to believe that the 500 witnesses of the ascension were actual witnesses, that to believe their stories were lies/fabrications/tales/exaggerations, without having anything to support the former idea other than the bible, which, and i think we can agree on this, is not god’s work, thus not infallibe, thus not reliable.
you assume that god doesn’t want to be hidden. then why is he communicating his existence solely through obscure concepts, and not obvious ones? if that would take away our free will, how do you explain Jesus’ and other biblical figures’ obvious miracles, which, by definition, should have taken away people’s free will to believe in god?
concerning abortion: because you clearly disagree with my idea on the beginning of the human life being subjective, i assume you possess (or at least there is) an objective, ultimate standpoint on that. what is it, why is it absolute, and what is it based on? also, why did you call doctors performing abortion delusional?
based on your reasonings, i am led to believe that you think that if today we didn’t have religion, the world would be a much worse place to live in. why?
concerning morality: what do you make of the dilemma that i described twice through our discussion, namely that if human beings are not in fact able to discern right from wrong themselves, then how could they choose between the two poles of morality presented to them by either god or the bible?
(the last time i could word this better, so i’ll just copypaste:
your ultimate standard for morality is the creator, aka the christian god. why him? who told you that his way should be the ultimate morality? he himself, didn’t he. how do you know that he possesses true morality? how do you know it is not for example satan who does? well, based on what god says of course, because you have no other point of reference. can you be sure that god’s morality is indeed the right one? what if satan’s morality is the right one, god just makes us believe that he is good and satan is evil? what if it’s the other way around? we have to decide somehow. what is a valid way of figuring out which one of them to pick? on our own. there is no other way. “yes there is! god tells us directly!” sure, but how do you know that he possesses the true morality? a vicious, self-contradicting circle. the only way of figuring out which one of them to pick is to figure it out on our own. but if we can do that, we eliminate the need for a creator in the first place.)
gotta go, maybe i missed a couple of things, but this is it for now. i’ll address “belief in god by the population of a country more or less equals the prosperity of said country” later.